Subject Re: Porting dBASE III to SQL?
From Mervyn Bick <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Date Thu, 17 May 2018 10:12:32 +0200
Newsgroups dbase.getting-started

On 2018-05-17 10:06 AM, Mervyn Bick wrote:

> It should be possible to go the DIY route but this would depend on the
> number of tables and the amount of time you can spare. :-)  Without a
> program to automate the process the creation of the tables on the SQL
> server is what takes the time.  The actual transfer of the data doesn't
> take long and dBASE can be left to churn away unattended for really long
> files once the groundwork has been done..

It was only when the message was returned to my newsreader that the
dBASE III registered.  The MySQL datapump and the DIY route would
require dBASE Plus rather than dBASE III.