Subject Re: Convertion
From Ivar B. Jessen <nospam@nospam.com>
Date Fri, 03 Jul 2015 16:01:50 +0200
Newsgroups dbase.getting-started

On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 03:05:36 -0400 ken
Sender:  ken <gkent_28@yahoo.com>
wrote the following in:
Newsgroup: dbase.getting-started
Subject: Convertion:
MessageID:<FZwPp6VtQHA.144@ip-AC1E04A7>
  
>hi ,
>is there a better way to covert the following numbers more easily?:
>
>from:                                 to:
>59                                      55
>56                                      55
>51                                      50
>43                                      40
>
>etc ....
>
>all number are I think converted to the nearest 0 and or 5.
>
>
>thnx and God Bless


As you don't say which way you use to convert the numbers I suggest you should
use my way which is far better :-)

Run the the example below to see why.


Ivar B. Jessen

//---
for i = 60 to 40 step - 1
        ? i, Round5(i)
next i

Function Round5(nNumber)
return nNumber - nNumber%5
//-----